The jury of a case against Apple in the US estimated Friday that the group Inform & aacute; tico American should pay 234 million d DOLLARS for violating a patent on technology & iacute; as integrated university . Wisconsin
The trial is inici & oacute; and last week Qued & oacute; Apple established infringi & oacute; that intellectual property concerning ways to improve the effectiveness and performance of processors Inform & aacute;. Ticos
While AFP AFIRM & oacute; that jurors had not RIVER an ruled on the amount of the financial penalty, EFE indic & oacute; to be RIVER an m & aacute; s 234 million d DOLLARS and that the amount requested by the university were 862 400 000
On that same patent, a Foundation & oacute;. n associated with the university also & eacute; n hab & iacute; a defendant to CO-RIVER Intel in 2008, and the case was resolved & oacute; to a CHILD following for an undisclosed sum
In its complaint, filed in early 2014, the Foundation & oacute;. n university clarifies that such technology & iacute; as were built & ldquo; unauthorized manner rdquo &; the A7 iPhone 5S, iPad Air and iPad Mini Retina display processor, on sale from a CHILD. or earlier
Apple tried & oacute; demonstrate that the patent in question & oacute; n was inv & aacute; outlet, but the jury Reject & oacute; his argument. An Apple spokeswoman contacted by AFP declined to comment on the ruling, but confirm & oacute; the group would appeal it
& ldquo;. The jury recognized & oacute; the pioneering work on processors that took place on our campus & rdquo ;, said in a statement Carl Gulbrandsen, who heads the Foundation & oacute; n of research & oacute; n university (WARF), and health & oacute; & Ldquo; good news for inventors & rdquo; and recognition of the & ldquo; & rdquo hard work; . of university researchers
The signing of the bitten apple est & aacute; . immersed also & eacute; n since to CHILDREN in a court battle with the CO-RIVER to South Korea’s Samsung on patent issues
Car
->
The jury of a case against Apple in the US estimated Friday that the US software group must pay $ 234 million for violating a patent on integrated technologies University of Wisconsin.
The trial began last week and was established that Apple violated the intellectual property concerning ways to improve the effectiveness and performance of computer processors.
While the agency AFP said that the jurors had not ruled on the amount of the financial penalty, EFE said that would be more than $ 234 million and that the amount requested by the university were 862.4 million.
On that same patent, a university linked to the foundation had also sued the company Intel in 2008, and the case was settled the following year for an undisclosed sum.
In its complaint, filed in early 2014, the university foundation clarifies that these technologies were integrated “unauthorized manner” to the iPhone 5S A7 processor, iPad Air and iPad Mini with Retina display, sales from the previous year.
Apple attempted to demonstrate that the patent at issue was invalid, but the jury rejected his argument. An Apple spokeswoman contacted by AFP declined to comment on the ruling, but confirmed that the group would appeal it.
“The jury recognized the pioneering work on processors held on our campus, “he said in a statement Carl Gulbrandsen, who heads the Research Foundation of the University (WARF), and greeted” very good news for inventors “and recognition of the” hard work “of university researchers.
The signing of the bitten apple is also immersed for years in a legal battle with the South Korean company Samsung for patent issues.
Car
No comments:
Post a Comment